Transparency as lightness - same as in flame same as in crystal. Ever noticed the light out of those is not dissimilar? I tend to lean toward one or the other, all the time.
And in both,
we have period of non-light.
Less gliss in crystal, defects, intrusions from other stones, lack of outside mirror images of light to reflect the clear of crystal?
And for the flame, the common talk - the fire is out, no more passion, no more firewood, depleted forests, and by lazy extension, no more electricity, no more no more, no more of more.
Less gliss in crystal, defects, intrusions from other stones, lack of outside mirror images of light to reflect the clear of crystal?
And for the flame, the common talk - the fire is out, no more passion, no more firewood, depleted forests, and by lazy extension, no more electricity, no more no more, no more of more.
Ah, but wait
--
Once we
couple crystal and flame, we may hopefully see that this is not about
either/or.
Rather
to stare at
clear water, yes, we learn to say these are clear sailings!
to stare at
muddy waters, no, we learn to say, stay clear.
- I propose
then to stare long enough until the particles of sand loam and clay separate,
and a space appears in between - that is one of the meanings of transparencies
- you do not change the waters - you see into them.
thus knowing
thy topic as mirror image to what you may see.
And here enters the topic of time, while you wait and gather up the necessary patience and knowledge to wait. Here is the exercise to be practiced.
And here enters the topic of time, while you wait and gather up the necessary patience and knowledge to wait. Here is the exercise to be practiced.
It occurs to
me that confrontation is, in a way, the mode of staring into the
"muddy" waters - into that we do not know, into the possibility of
change.
Society and
physical reality are separate entities.
The
anthropomorphic view eventually always gives way to a more earthy reality, or,
if you wish, to a cosmic reality - a slightly larger scale. or a smaller
scale ( the bug, the virus, the tiny)
What you
touch - gets touched AND moves on with your touch. No way for us to deny
that simple reality.
Sympathy with
your materials
as harmony.
Interesting
that in architecture the "people" who make up a structure are called
materials, as opposed to the architect, who calls himself a man.
The notion of
leavers and takers, a book called
Ishmael
the notion of
leavers and takers still places man at the center, does it not?
And the issue
of control comes to mind - No. No, it
will not change – I am in control, here!
“ Ah, but to control is to take. “
and, at the
end of this particular time
it is not
about moving or change
- that
is a given. -
it is more
about moving and change in a particular manner
every single
paratactic moment, in grace
it is about a
take in cinema, flash, point, swish
and hwishh of
eternal oceans
as long as we
stop
when the
endings are there
we leave
hwishh and
swish of oceans
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário